Back to March 2004 Looking at Art
The Mets portrait of Caracalla is a consummate example of art as propaganda
Mawell L. Anderson by
Maxwell L. Anderson
The George Bush action doll made its debut in September, with the president clad in a flight suit, to commemorate his landing on an aircraft carrier off San Diego last spring. This particular genre of portraiture may seem infelicitous to some, but the tradition of heralding civic leaders as military heroes reaches back to antiquity. No artists were more accomplished at this than Roman portrait sculptors, who at times risked their lives to capture the likeness of a ruler who wanted to burnish his claim to the imperial throne.
This marble head of Caracalla was acquired by the Metropolitan Museum of Art in 1940, along with fragments of the statue from which it was broken. Caracalla adopts his customary sharp turn of the head, as if signaling vigilance for assassination attempts or military provocations. Recalling a physiognomic trope of the Roman Republic, he wears a scowl, suggesting this time not the sober dedication to matters of state but an impatient, indomitable spirit. When the features were highlighted with paintas the hair, eyes, and lips likely werehis expression would have seemed even more immediate.
After his murder in 217, Caracalla was deified by his successor, Macrinus, in a cynical move to establish his own credentials. Intentional defacement might nonetheless have led to the damages inflicted on this particular sculpture, which likely dates from the end of Caracallas life or shortly after his death. Because this ranks as one of the finest surviving examples of his portraits, it may well have been prominently displayed in publicperhaps in a temple or an official building. It is fully carved in back, suggesting that it was shown in the round. Caracalla is often depicted in a military cape, with a clasp at the shoulder, so this statue would have been a dramatic monument in any public setting.
Modern-day campaign commercials seek to portray politicians in a variety of lights. A solitary sculpture can register only one point of view, and in this case, the subject is seen as an accomplished soldier, watching over the borders of a restless empire, perhaps less self-assured than determined to prevail. While the formula is repeated in dozens of surviving examplesin portraits in the round, reliefs, bronzes, gems, coins, and other mediathis one stands out as among the most virtuosic in the sure quality of the carving. The psychology of this tormented manin our minds eye, we overlay the humorless grimaces of warriors throughout human historyis at once open to us and impenetrable. To a Roman of Caracallas time, the image would have been as intimidating as Uncle Joes statuary in 1930s Russia and probably the object of as much distrust.
To a modern viewer, the potency of masterful political art gains in stature as its particular circumstances fade. Upon Caracallas death, the Roman Empire teetered on self-destruction, and the tough-guy image he projected is all the more poignant because we know the ultimate fate of this civilization. While the engine of state would eventually grind to a halt after ceaseless assaults from without, the visual vernacular of ancient Roman portraits lives on as powerfully as everemulated in everything from televised images of leaders taking heroic poses during times of strife to plastic dolls.
Maxwell L. Anderson, former director of the Whitney Museum of American Art, is a Leadership Fellow at the Yale School of Management and is currently at work on a book titled The Quality Instinct, an exploration of how some people find their way to becoming connoisseurs.
|